SummaryReasons to consider Radeon R7 350X OEM43 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 5770 .This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.Supports Direct3D 12 Async ComputeSupports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)Supports MantleBased on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications Show Reasons to consider Radeon HD 5770Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications  HWBench recommends Radeon R7 350X OEMBased on theoretical specifications. Core ConfigurationRadeon R7 350X OEMRadeon HD 5770GPU NameOland (Oland XT)vsJuniper (Juniper XT)Fab Process28 nmvs40 nmDie Size90 mm²vs166 mm²Transistors1,040 millionvs1,040 millionShaders384vs800Compute Units6vs10Core clock1000 MHzvs850 MHzROPs8vs16TMUs24vs40 Memory ConfigurationRadeon R7 350X OEMRadeon HD 5770Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5Bus Width128 bitvs128 bitMemory Speed1000 MHz 2000 MHz effectivevs1200 MHz 4800 MHz effectiveMemory Size4096 Mbvs1024 Mb Additional detailsRadeon R7 350X OEMRadeon HD 5770TDP65 wattsvs108 wattsRelease Date5 May 2015vs13 Oct 2009
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GB/s - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
SummaryReasons to consider Radeon HD 5770Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications Reasons to consider Radeon R7 350 OEM43 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 5770 .This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.Supports Direct3D 12 Async ComputeSupports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)Supports MantleBased on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications HWBench recommends Radeon R7 350 OEMBased on theoretical specifications. Core ConfigurationRadeon HD 5770Radeon R7 350 OEMGPU NameJuniper (Juniper XT)vsOland (Oland XT)Fab Process40 nmvs28 nmDie Size166 mm²vs90 mm²Transistors1,040 millionvs1,040 millionShaders800vs384Compute Units10vs6Core clock850 MHzvs1000 MHzROPs16vs8TMUs40vs24 Memory ConfigurationRadeon HD 5770Radeon R7 350 OEMMemory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5Bus Width128 bitvs128 bitMemory Speed1200 MHz 4800 MHz effectivevs1125 MHz 4500 MHz effectiveMemory Size1024 Mbvs1024 Mb Additional detailsRadeon HD 5770Radeon R7 350 OEMTDP108 wattsvs65 wattsRelease Date13 Oct 2009vs5 May 2015
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GB/s - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better Chúng tôi so sánh hai GPU Nền tảng máy tính để bàn: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition và 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP để xem GPU nào có hiệu suất tốt hơn trong các thông số kỹ thuật chính, kiểm tra đánh giá, tiêu thụ điện năng, v.v. Khác biệt chínhRadeon R7 360 896SPLợi thế Phát hành 4 năm và 11 tháng sau VRAM nhiều hơn (2GB so với 1GB) Băng thông VRAM lớn hơn (96.00GB/s so với 76.48GB/s) Công suất TDP thấp hơn (85W so với 108W) Điểm sốTiêu chuẩnFP32 (số thực) Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition 1360 Radeon R7 360 896SP+44% 1971 Card đồ họaThg 7 2010 Ngày phát hành Thg 6 2015 Evergreen Thế hệ Pirate Islands PCIe 2.0 x16 Giao diện bus PCIe 3.0 x16 Tốc độ đồng hồ1195MHz Tốc độ bộ nhớ 1500MHz Bộ nhớ1024MB Dung lượng bộ nhớ 2GB 76.48GB/s Băng thông 96.00GB/s Cấu hình hiển thị8 KB (per CU) Bộ nhớ cache L1 16 KB (per CU) 256KB Bộ nhớ cache L2 256KB Hiệu suất lý thuyết13.60GPixel/s Tốc độ pixel 17.60GPixel/s 34.00GTexel/s Tốc độ texture 61.60GTexel/s 1360 GFLOPS FP32 (float) 1.971 TFLOPS - FP64 (double) 123.2 GFLOPS Bộ xử lý đồ họaJuniper XT (215-0754013) Phiên bản GPU Tobago XT TeraScale 2 Kiến trúc GCN 2.0 40 nm Kích thước quy trình 28 nm 1,040 million Transistors 2,080 million 166mm² Kích thước die 160mm² Thiết kế bo mạch chủ108W Công suất tiêu thụ 85W 300W Nguồn điện đề xuất 250W 1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1 Cổng kết nối 2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2 1x 6-pin Đầu nối nguồn 1x 6-pin Tính năng đồ họa11.2 (11_0) DirectX 12 (12_0) So sánh CPU liên quan |
