Ngay từ thời điểm ra mắt, Intel HD Graphics 620 là card đồ họa được đánh giá khá cao trên các dòng laptop. Được tích hợp trên các dòng GPU thế hệ thứ 7 Kaby Lake vậy nó có mạnh không? Còn chơi được game gì trong năm 2021 này? Show
 Intel UHD Graphics 620 là gì?Intel UHD Graphics 620 là là card đồ họa onboard được tích hợp vào máy tính có CPU tiết kiệm điện năng như i7 Core i7-8550U và Core i7-8565U từ năm 2018, 2019. Card onboard này có tên gọi khác UHD thay vì HD. Chữ U lấy từ ULV (Ultra Low Voltage) có nghĩa là siêu tiết kiệm điện. Nên bạn có thể hiểu cơ bản đây là một dòng chip có giúp laptop tiết kiệm nguồn điện (pin). Nó tiêu thụ khoảng khoảng 15W. Card Intel UHD Graphics 620 xung nhịp tối đa đạt 1.150 MHz, cao hơn 100 MHz so với HD Graphics. Như vậy lúc sử dụng tác vụ liên quan đồ họa nặng hoặc bộ nhớ cache eDRAM, Graphics HD 620 sử dụng bộ nhớ của Ram (2x 64bit DDR3 / DDR4). Nên khi dùng tác vụ đồ họa nặng, đồ họa thì UHD có ưu thế hơn hẳn. Xem phim hoặc chơi game có đồ họa 4K mượt mà đến khoảng 30% so với HD. Intel UHD Graphics 620 được xây dựng công nghệ chip 14nm. Cùng bộ xử lý đồ họa Skylake GT2 cho khả năng xử lý đồ họa mượt mà và ổn định. Nó cấu thành bởi 192 đơn vị bóng, 24 đơn vị bản đồ kết cấu và 3 ROP. GPU hoạt động tại tần số 300Hz khả năng đáp ứng lên đến 1050 MHz. Card màn hình onboard UHD Graphics 620 là bước đột phá đáng kể giải quyết vấn đề laptop mỏng gọn nhưng vẫn đảm bảo hiệu suất cao. Thông số cơ bản của Intel UHD Graphics 620Intel UHD Graphics 620 benmarkIntel UHD Graphics 620 chơi được game gì?Mặc dù đã ra mắt cách đây 2 năm, nhưng ở thời điểm 2021 khả năng chơi game Intel UHD Graphics 620 cũng còn khá ổn. Tuy rằng không thể so với những dòng card đồ họa rời khác nhưng đây vẫn là một lựa chọn chống cháy giúp bạn chơi game trên laptop trong mùa dịch. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores38424Core clock speed1122 MHz300 MHzBoost clock speed1242 MHz1150 MHzNumber of transistorsno data189 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm14 nmPower consumption (TDP)15-25 Watt15 WattTexture fill rate29.8127.60Floating-point performance953.9 gflopsno data Size and compatibilityInformation on GeForce MX130 and UHD Graphics 620 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Laptop sizemedium sizedno dataInterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5LPDDR3/DDR4Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GBMemory bus width64 BitSystem SharedMemory clock speed5012 MHzSystem SharedMemory bandwidth40.1 GB/sno dataShared memory-+ Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. Optimus+no dataQuick Syncno data+ API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)Shader Model5.16.4OpenGL4.64.6OpenCL1.22.1Vulkan1.1.1261.1.103CUDA+no data Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GeForce MX130 4.79 +80.8% GeForce MX130 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by 81% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% GeForce MX130 1861 +80.7% GeForce MX130 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by 81% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% GeForce MX130 11968 +63.3% GeForce MX130 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by 63% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% GeForce MX130 2875 +64.9% GeForce MX130 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by 65% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% GeForce MX130 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by 101% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% GeForce MX130 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by 46% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. 3DMark Ice Storm GPUIce Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% GeForce MX130 170596 +92.2% GeForce MX130 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by 92% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU. Unigine Heaven 3.0This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine. Benchmark coverage: 4% GeForce MX130 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by 45% in Unigine Heaven 3.0. Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD18 13 1440p27−30 16 4K14−16 8 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 20774 6 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey8−9 +0% 8 +0% Assassin's Creed Valhalla2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Battlefield 514−16 +180% 5−6 −180% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare16−18 +33.3% 12−14 −33.3% Cyberpunk 20778−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Far Cry 514 +100% 7 −100% Far Cry New Dawn10−11 +66.7% 6 −66.7% Forza Horizon 416−18 +33.3% 12 −33.3% Hitman 310−11 +150% 4−5 −150% Horizon Zero Dawn11 +175% 4−5 −175% Red Dead Redemption 29−10 +80% 5 −80% Shadow of the Tomb Raider13 +117% 6 −117% Watch Dogs: Legion11 +1000% 1−2 −1000% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey8−9 +167% 3−4 −167% Assassin's Creed Valhalla2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Battlefield 514−16 +180% 5−6 −180% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare16−18 +33.3% 12−14 −33.3% Cyberpunk 20778−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Far Cry 513 +117% 6 −117% Far Cry New Dawn10−11 +100% 5 −100% Forza Horizon 416−18 +100% 8−9 −100% Hitman 310−11 +150% 4−5 −150% Horizon Zero Dawn9−10 +125% 4−5 −125% Metro Exodus3 −33.3% 4 +33.3% Red Dead Redemption 29−10 +50% 6−7 −50% Shadow of the Tomb Raider12−14 +33.3% 9−10 −33.3% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt14 +133% 6 −133% Watch Dogs: Legion6−7 +500% 1−2 −500% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey8−9 +167% 3−4 −167% Assassin's Creed Valhalla2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Battlefield 514−16 +180% 5−6 −180% Cyberpunk 20778−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Far Cry 512 +100% 6 −100% Far Cry New Dawn10−11 +233% 3−4 −233% Forza Horizon 416−18 +100% 8−9 −100% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt7 +133% 3 −133% Watch Dogs: Legion6−7 +500% 1−2 −500% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare8−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Hitman 38−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Horizon Zero Dawn10−11 +11.1% 9−10 −11.1% Metro Exodus4−5 +100% 2−3 −100% Red Dead Redemption 23−4 +200% 1−2 −200% Shadow of the Tomb Raider7−8 +16.7% 6−7 −16.7% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Cyberpunk 20772−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Far Cry 58−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Far Cry New Dawn5−6 +150% 2−3 −150% Forza Horizon 47−8 +133% 3−4 −133% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt4−5 +300% 1−2 −300% Watch Dogs: Legion0−1 0−1 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare3−4 +50% 2−3 −50% Hitman 35−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Horizon Zero Dawn8−9 +14.3% 7−8 −14.3% Red Dead Redemption 22−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Shadow of the Tomb Raider1−2 0−1 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt0−1 0−1 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey1−2 0−1 Assassin's Creed Valhalla1−2 0−1 Cyberpunk 20770−1 0−1 Far Cry 55−6 +25% 4−5 −25% Far Cry New Dawn8−9 +33.3% 6−7 −33.3% Forza Horizon 46−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Watch Dogs: Legion0−1 0−1 This is how GeForce MX130 and UHD Graphics 620 compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 4.79 2.65 Recency 1 January 2018 1 September 2017 Pipelines / CUDA cores 384 24 Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm The GeForce MX130 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 620 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce MX130 UHD Graphics 620 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate Intel UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
