What is actual performance and standard performance?

Disclaimer

The questions posted on the site are solely user generated, Doubtnut has no ownership or control over the nature and content of those questions. Doubtnut is not responsible for any discrepancies concerning the duplicity of content over those questions.

Learning Objective

  1. Describe the process by which a manager monitors operations and assesses performance.

Let’s pause for a minute and reflect on the management functions that we’ve discussed so far—planning, organizing, and directing. As founder of Notes-4-You, you began by establishing plans for your new company. You defined its mission and set objectives, or performance targets, which you needed to meet in order to achieve your mission. Then, you organized your company by allocating the people and resources required to carry out your plans. Finally, you provided focus and direction to your employees and motivated them to achieve organizational objectives. Is your job finished? Can you take a well-earned vacation? Unfortunately, the answer is no: your work has just begun. Now that things are rolling along, you need to monitor your operations to see whether everything is going according to plan. If it’s not, you’ll need to take corrective action. This process of comparing actual to planned performance and taking necessary corrective action is called controllingManagement process of comparing actual to planned performance and taking corrective actions when necessary..

A Five-Step Control Process

You can think of the control function as the five-step process outlined in Figure 6.10 "Five-Step Control Process".

Figure 6.10 Five-Step Control Process

What is actual performance and standard performance?

Let’s see how this process might work at Notes-4-You. Let’s assume that, after evaluating class enrollments, you estimate that you can sell one hundred notes packages per month to students taking the sophomore-level geology course popularly known as “Rocks for Jocks.” So you set your standard at a hundred units. At the end of the month, however, you look over your records and find that you sold only eighty. Comparing your actual performance with your planned performance, you realize that you came up twenty packages short. In talking with your salespeople, you learn why: it turns out that the copy machine broke down so often that packages frequently weren’t ready on time. You immediately take corrective action by increasing maintenance on the copy machine.

Now, let’s try a slightly different scenario. Let’s say that you still have the same standard (one hundred packages) and that actual sales are still eighty packages. In investigating the reason for the shortfall, you find that you overestimated the number of students taking “Rocks for Jocks.” Calculating a more accurate number of students, you see that your original standard—estimated sales—was too high by twenty packages. In this case, you should adjust your standards to reflect expected sales of eighty packages.

In both situations, your control process has been helpful. In the first instance, you were alerted to a problem that cut into your sales. Correcting this problem would undoubtedly increase sales and, therefore, profits. In the second case, you encountered a defect in your planning and learned a good managerial lesson: plan more carefully.

Key Takeaway

The process of comparing actual to planned performance and taking corrective action is called controlling. The control function can be viewed as a five-step process: (1) establish standards, (2) measure performance, (3) compare actual performance with standards and identify any deviations, (4) determine the reason for deviations, and (5) take corrective action if needed.

Exercise

(AACSB) Analysis

Have you ever gone to an ice cream stand and noticed that the “double dipper” ice cream cone the customer beside you bought has a lot more ice cream than does your “double dipper?” If you were the supervisor of the ice cream stand, how would you ensure that all cones received the same amount of ice cream? What if, instead of being the supervisor of the ice cream stand, you are the manager of a professional baseball team? How would you apply the five-step control process to your job as manager?

PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES AND STANDARDS

Performance objectives and standards are the most common methods to define the basis for measuring performance results. Using these objectives and standards, managers can provide specific feedback to describe the gap between the expected and actual performance. For every job position, it is desirable to define the performance objectives and standards to track the results of employees' performance. A finer distinction between the performance standards and objectives can be made: while standards are more related to job-task completion and can be tracked to the individual-level performance, objectives are more aligned with the overall organizational performance, leading to the achievement of business goals. Both ...

Which need is a difference between standard and actual performance?

The term used to indicate the difference between standard performance and actual performance is 'Deviation'.

What is standard performance?

Definition. A performance standard is a management-approved expression of the performance threshold(s), requirement(s), or expectation(s) that must be met to be appraised at a particular level of performance.

Why it is important to compare the actual performance with the standard performance?

"Comparing the actual performance with the laid standards, finding out the deviations and taking corrective action is an important process of a function of management".

What is meant by measuring actual performance?

Performance measurement is generally defined as regular measurement of outcomes and results, which generates reliable data on the effectiveness and efficiency of programs. Input. Resources (human resources, employee time, funding) used to conduct activities and provide services. Activity.