- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- Radeon R7 350X OEM vs Radeon HD 5770
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 350X OEM
43 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 5770 .This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.Supports Direct3D 12 Async ComputeSupports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)Supports MantleBased on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 5770
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
HWBench recommends Radeon R7 350X OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
Radeon R7 350X OEMRadeon HD 5770GPU NameOland (Oland XT)vsJuniper (Juniper XT)Fab Process28 nmvs40 nmDie Size90 mm²vs166 mm²Transistors1,040 millionvs1,040 millionShaders384vs800Compute Units6vs10Core clock1000 MHzvs850 MHzROPs8vs16TMUs24vs40
Memory Configuration
Radeon R7 350X OEMRadeon HD 5770Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5Bus Width128 bitvs128 bitMemory Speed1000 MHz 2000 MHz effectivevs1200 MHz 4800 MHz effectiveMemory Size4096 Mbvs1024 Mb
Additional details
Radeon R7 350X OEMRadeon HD 5770TDP65 wattsvs108 wattsRelease Date5 May 2015vs13 Oct 2009
- Radeon R7 350X OEM 8.00 GP/s
- Radeon HD 5770 13.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
- Radeon R7 350X OEM 24.00 GT/s
- Radeon HD 5770 34.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
- Radeon R7 350X OEM 32.00 GB/s
- Radeon HD 5770 76.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
- Radeon R7 350X OEM 768.00 GFLOPs
- Radeon HD 5770 1360.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- Radeon HD 5770 vs Radeon R7 350 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 5770
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 350 OEM
43 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 5770 .This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.Supports Direct3D 12 Async ComputeSupports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)Supports MantleBased on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
HWBench recommends Radeon R7 350 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
Radeon HD 5770Radeon R7 350 OEMGPU NameJuniper (Juniper XT)vsOland (Oland XT)Fab Process40 nmvs28 nmDie Size166 mm²vs90 mm²Transistors1,040 millionvs1,040 millionShaders800vs384Compute Units10vs6Core clock850 MHzvs1000 MHzROPs16vs8TMUs40vs24
Memory Configuration
Radeon HD 5770Radeon R7 350 OEMMemory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5Bus Width128 bitvs128 bitMemory Speed1200 MHz 4800 MHz effectivevs1125 MHz 4500 MHz effectiveMemory Size1024 Mbvs1024 Mb
Additional details
Radeon HD 5770Radeon R7 350 OEMTDP108 wattsvs65 wattsRelease Date13 Oct 2009vs5 May 2015
- Radeon HD 5770 13.60 GP/s
- Radeon R7 350 OEM 8.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
- Radeon HD 5770 34.00 GT/s
- Radeon R7 350 OEM 24.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
- Radeon HD 5770 76.80 GB/s
- Radeon R7 350 OEM 72.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
- Radeon HD 5770 1360.00 GFLOPs
- Radeon R7 350 OEM 768.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Chúng tôi so sánh hai GPU Nền tảng máy tính để bàn: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition và 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP để xem GPU nào có hiệu suất tốt hơn trong các thông số kỹ thuật chính, kiểm tra đánh giá, tiêu thụ điện năng, v.v.
Khác biệt chính
Radeon R7 360 896SPLợi thế
Phát hành 4 năm và 11 tháng sau
VRAM nhiều hơn (2GB so với 1GB)
Băng thông VRAM lớn hơn (96.00GB/s so với 76.48GB/s)
Công suất TDP thấp hơn (85W so với 108W)
Điểm số
Tiêu chuẩn
FP32 (số thực)
Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition
1360
Radeon R7 360 896SP+44%
1971
Card đồ họa
Thg 7 2010
Ngày phát hành
Thg 6 2015
Evergreen
Thế hệ
Pirate Islands
PCIe 2.0 x16
Giao diện bus
PCIe 3.0 x16
Tốc độ đồng hồ
1195MHz
Tốc độ bộ nhớ
1500MHz
Bộ nhớ
1024MB
Dung lượng bộ nhớ
2GB
76.48GB/s
Băng thông
96.00GB/s
Cấu hình hiển thị
8 KB (per CU)
Bộ nhớ cache L1
16 KB (per CU)
256KB
Bộ nhớ cache L2
256KB
Hiệu suất lý thuyết
13.60GPixel/s
Tốc độ pixel
17.60GPixel/s
34.00GTexel/s
Tốc độ texture
61.60GTexel/s
1360 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS
Bộ xử lý đồ họa
Juniper XT (215-0754013)
Phiên bản GPU
Tobago XT
TeraScale 2
Kiến trúc
GCN 2.0
40 nm
Kích thước quy trình
28 nm
1,040 million
Transistors
2,080 million
166mm²
Kích thước die
160mm²
Thiết kế bo mạch chủ
108W
Công suất tiêu thụ
85W
300W
Nguồn điện đề xuất
250W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Cổng kết nối
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Đầu nối nguồn
1x 6-pin
Tính năng đồ họa
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)